Peter J. Grey
2005-09-01 16:05:24 UTC
I suppose this is really a question about Latin textbooks, but it's
always puzzled me.
General interrogative sentences are explained, in all the books I've
read at least, as being made by placing -ne at the beginning of the
sentence, where 'beginning' means following the first word since -ne is
an enclitic.
Then negative interrogative sentences are explained separately as made
by placing nonne at the beginning.
Maybe I'm missing something, but is the second part saying anything more
than the negative interrogative begins with non with -ne added in its
usual role?
always puzzled me.
General interrogative sentences are explained, in all the books I've
read at least, as being made by placing -ne at the beginning of the
sentence, where 'beginning' means following the first word since -ne is
an enclitic.
Then negative interrogative sentences are explained separately as made
by placing nonne at the beginning.
Maybe I'm missing something, but is the second part saying anything more
than the negative interrogative begins with non with -ne added in its
usual role?